x wrote:
> mAsterdam wrote:
>
>>x wrote:
>
>>>>>http://microgold.com/Stage/UML_FAQ.html say it is an object oriented
>>>>>modeling method.
>>>
>>>>Which is a common misconception due to sloppy wording.
>>>
>>>Then why there are class diagrams in it ?
>
>>Because the class structure is one of the nice-to-have's
>>when you have a piece of software you are working on?
>>Maybe I don't understand the question.
>
>
> How UML is not object oriented when you are building class diagrams by using
> it ?
Ah :-) I objected to UML being a method, not against it
being object oriented - the class diagrams certainly are
meant to support object oriented design.
Received on Tue Feb 14 2006 - 02:21:26 CST
