Re: Multi Valued Interface Models?
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:21:26 +0100
Message-ID: <43f19288$0$11070$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
>
>
>
>
> How UML is not object oriented when you are building class diagrams by using
> it ?
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:21:26 +0100
Message-ID: <43f19288$0$11070$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
x wrote:
> mAsterdam wrote:
>
>>x wrote:
>
>>>>>http://microgold.com/Stage/UML_FAQ.html say it is an object oriented >>>>>modeling method. >>> >>>>Which is a common misconception due to sloppy wording. >>> >>>Then why there are class diagrams in it ?
>
>>Because the class structure is one of the nice-to-have's >>when you have a piece of software you are working on? >>Maybe I don't understand the question.
>
>
> How UML is not object oriented when you are building class diagrams by using
> it ?
Ah :-) I objected to UML being a method, not against it being object oriented - the class diagrams certainly are meant to support object oriented design. Received on Tue Feb 14 2006 - 09:21:26 CET