Re: Multi Valued Interface Models?
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:06:09 +0200
Message-ID: <dss6i3$bg8$1_at_nntp.aioe.org>
"mAsterdam" <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> wrote in message
news:43f19288$0$11070$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl...
> x wrote:
> > mAsterdam wrote:
> >
> >>x wrote:
> >
> >>>>>http://microgold.com/Stage/UML_FAQ.html say it is an object oriented
> >>>>>modeling method.
> >>>
> >>>>Which is a common misconception due to sloppy wording.
> >>>
> >>>Then why there are class diagrams in it ?
> >
> >>Because the class structure is one of the nice-to-have's
> >>when you have a piece of software you are working on?
> >>Maybe I don't understand the question.
> >
> > How UML is not object oriented when you are building class diagrams by
using
> > it ?
> Ah :-) I objected to UML being a method, not against it
> being object oriented - the class diagrams certainly are
> meant to support object oriented design.
My bad. Thanks! Received on Tue Feb 14 2006 - 10:06:09 CET