Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec
From: latimerp <">
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 17:51:48 -0500
Message-ID: <GNSdnVPtde5gJnLenZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d_at_comcast.com>
>
>
> You're a touchy bastard, aren't you?
Astute observation Luke ;)
Frank, try using smaller words that you have a better command of. If I was you I'd start with 2 syllables and build on that.
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 17:51:48 -0500
Message-ID: <GNSdnVPtde5gJnLenZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d_at_comcast.com>
Luke Webber wrote:
> Frank van Bortel wrote:
>
>> Don't top post - can I suggest you use a decent news reader? >> As you see, your ugly format/utility cuts off the rest of the thread.
>
>
> You're a touchy bastard, aren't you?
Astute observation Luke ;)
<snip>,psss This cuts off the thread too.
>
>> Point is: a decent Linux will deliver better throughput on the *same* >> hardware. Changed 'twice the' into 'better'. Can't substantiate twice, >> can better.
Frank, try using smaller words that you have a better command of. If I was you I'd start with 2 syllables and build on that.
<;=), Patrick
>
> Luke
Received on Sun Feb 12 2006 - 23:51:48 CET