Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:00:21 GMT
Actually, please avoid bottom posting. Its difficult to follow a thread when users have to scroll to the bottom to see the content. If you want to jump in mid-stream, then work bottom up.
Yes, a good news reader lets you choose to top post or bottom post. I personally like top posting.
Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com> wrote in news:dsimqj$1tp$1_at_news2.zwoll1.ov.home.nl:
>> Right then Joel, lets have a go then. >> >> Whats your argument? >> >> Even on a build your own box costing around £500 can deliver over >> 50MBytes / second write and read speeds using Windows Server. >> >> Go for the 64 bit version and you can get quite a few GBytes of >> memory, most entry level boards <£100 take 4GB of DDR. >>
> Don't top post - can I suggest you use a decent news reader?
> As you see, your ugly format/utility cuts off the rest of the thread.
> Point is: a decent Linux will deliver better throughput on the *same*
> hardware. Changed 'twice the' into 'better'. Can't substantiate twice,
> can better.
> And personally, I'd love to see you stop promoting non-oracle stuff
> here. It's annoying; most people here hate Microsoft anyway.
> Just a little further, and you're spamming.
Received on Tue Feb 14 2006 - 16:00:21 CET