Re: sql views for denomalizing

In message <RQoIe.569$Je.557_at_newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>, David Cressey <david.cressey_at_earthlink.net> writes
>
>"Eric Junkermann" <eric_at_deptj.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:mXBUWZVyBU8CFw3u_at_deptj.demon.co.uk...
>
>> There is no problem in having a structure clash between the logical
>> model and the presentation of the data in a user interface, that is what
>> programming is about.
>
>Excellent point!
>
>If I can add my two cents to your megabuck,
>
>The difference between a conceptual view of the data and a logical view of
>the data is that, at the conceptual level, the distinction between storage,
>retrieval and sharing on the one hand, and presentation and look and feel
>on the other, doesn't have a large impact on the model.
>
>In fact, a single conceptual model ought to communicate with: the data
>architect, the development DBA, the programmers, the end users of the
>system, the end users of the data, and any other stakeholders.
>
>If these stakeholders can't agree on a common model, there are deeper
>problems than structural clash.
>
>

Thankyou, I do seem to have ignored the conceptual level.

Eric

-- 
Eric Junkermann