| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: database systems: an environment of roles & players
"dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1113662390.905906.209840_at_g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> mountain man wrote:
>> "mAsterdam" <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> wrote in message >> news:4260d199$0$95207$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl... >> > mountain man wrote: >> >> "dawn" wrote >> >>>mountain man wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>In the following tabulation we list a number of different >> >>>>roles and players that would normally be associated with >> >>>>the database systems environment at any organisation. >> >>> >> >>>Your list doesn't look like something "associated with the
>> >>>systems environment at any organisation" but only with those >> >>>organizations employing a relational model -- is that correct? >> >> >> >> No, it was supposed to be for any organisation over >> >> a certain size, at which time they will all have invested >> >> in some DBMS of some form. It need not be related >> >> to the RM. >> > [snip] >> >>>>================================== >> >>>> DATABASE SYSTEMS ROLE-TYPES >> >>>>================================== >> >>>> >> >>>>--------------- Internal to the organisation: >> >>>>I01 - business owner(s) >> >>>>I02 - business executives and managers >> >>>>I03 - general organisation work-groups/end-users >> >>>>I04 - DBA >> >>> >> >>>This role, as typically defined in an organization supporting >> >>>SQL-DBMS's does not exist at companies not supporting SQL-DBMS's. >> >>> >> >>>I would add a "data modeling" role, however, which seems to be
>> >>>independent of implementation tools. >> > >> > The 'Data administrator' specializes in meaning, consistency,
>> > used in datamodels. I have seen DA's in SQL and non SQL shops. I
>> > seen sites who should need a DA but lacked the cooperative culture
>> > to sustain the work. >> >> >> Yes, one expects that this role has the greatest chance >> of exhibiting understanding of data modelling. However >> you never know - because often other parties (roles) >> itemised above also have these skills. >
Roles (and the skill sets associated with them) probably change slightly from country to country, and decade to decade ;-)
>> >>>>I05 - IT manager >> >>>>I06 - internal programmers >> >>>>I07 - specialised development teams >> >>>>I08 - Operations & help desk personnel >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>--------------- External to the organisation: >> > >> > Why the Internal/External split? >> >> >> Usually the contractual responsibilities are different >> between internal and external roles. >
Of course.
> I agree that the Internal/External designation being
> applied to a role isn't helpful. If a particular position is assigned
> a role, it could also be assigned an employment classification.
Knowledge of the entire scope of role-types associated with the management of a database system - and their function - is useful, and the internal/external designation is helpful in managing the organisation.
>> Also, it enables >> a perspective to be placed on the self-independence >> of an organisation on IT resources, and/or in the >> complimentary sense, whether that organisation >> relies heavily on outsourced skills. >
It is just a list of roles. Often people assume the perspective of one (or more) of these roles when arguing about the database system environment in general - or certain theory surrounding databases.
It is helpful to identify when this happens, and important to understand how all these different perspectives may be reconciled from a global perspective.
Pete Brown
Falls Creek
Oz
www.mountainman.com.au
Received on Thu Apr 21 2005 - 04:20:07 CDT
![]() |
![]() |