Re: Terminology for composite attributes
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_ucantrade.com.NOTHERE>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:22:41 -0700
Message-ID: <7nsn51d57db4pbo6m8jeu8v2qlccqi8hu7_at_4ax.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:22:41 -0700
Message-ID: <7nsn51d57db4pbo6m8jeu8v2qlccqi8hu7_at_4ax.com>
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:24:37 +0100, Noel <nobody_at_nowhere.com> wrote:
>On 23 Mar 2005 06:55:41 -0800, "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>And so your answer to the question of terminology for "composite
>>attributes" would be ... ? --dawn
>
>I wouldn't worry about it. I think Neo is an XDb3 script-bot ;-)
I suppose it is possible since a number of compilers have been written in the language they compile. None of them, to my knowledge, have had $1,000 either.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko Received on Tue Apr 12 2005 - 18:22:41 CEST