Re: Terminology for composite attributes

From: Noel <nobody_at_nowhere.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:24:37 +0100
Message-ID: <5s9j511ld0ut03guui3o1oh6a3ecvj87r8_at_4ax.com>

On 23 Mar 2005 06:55:41 -0800, "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote:

>And so your answer to the question of terminology for "composite
>attributes" would be ... ? --dawn

I wouldn't worry about it. I think Neo is an XDb3 script-bot ;-) Received on Mon Apr 11 2005 - 00:24:37 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Previous message: mountain man: "the relational model of data objects *and* program objects"
Maybe in reply to: B-17: "Re: Terminology for composite attributes"
Next in thread: Gene Wirchenko: "Re: Terminology for composite attributes"
Reply: (deleted message) Gene Wirchenko: "Re: Terminology for composite attributes"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message