Re: Argument for 1NF by counter-example
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_mail.ocis.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:01:57 -0700
Message-ID: <ctjon09nksjck5trshusihd99g3fdl4670_at_4ax.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:01:57 -0700
Message-ID: <ctjon09nksjck5trshusihd99g3fdl4670_at_4ax.com>
"Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote:
>"robert" <gnuoytr_at_rcn.com> wrote in message
>news:da3c2186.0410240956.76e4a5d1_at_posting.google.com...
>> if you can refute say, Pascal's, objections to XQuery (lots of other
>> thoughtful people have published on the futility of XML/XQuery, so you're
>> free to pick another); then i'll listen to this drivel.
>
>It's not drivel. It may or may not be wrong, but the person who wrote it is
>not a total fool.
If it is wrong, it is drivel.
>You can strengthen your argument without resorting to name calling.
Shame on you, robert, for calling people thoughtful.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices.Received on Mon Oct 25 2004 - 03:01:57 CEST