Re: Argument for 1NF by counter-example

"Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote:

>"robert" <gnuoytr_at_rcn.com> wrote in message
>news:da3c2186.0410240956.76e4a5d1_at_posting.google.com...
>> if you can refute say, Pascal's, objections to XQuery (lots of other
>> thoughtful people have published on the futility of XML/XQuery, so you're
>> free to pick another); then i'll listen to this drivel.
>
>It's not drivel. It may or may not be wrong, but the person who wrote it is
>not a total fool.

     If it is wrong, it is drivel.

>You can strengthen your argument without resorting to name calling.

     Shame on you, robert, for calling people thoughtful.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:

     I have preferences.
     You have biases.
     He/She has prejudices.