Re: Argument for 1NF by counter-example

From: Laconic2 <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:48:27 -0400
Message-ID: <1dCdncVMDNCImuHcRVn-vA_at_comcast.com>


"robert" <gnuoytr_at_rcn.com> wrote in message news:da3c2186.0410240956.76e4a5d1_at_posting.google.com...
> if you can refute say, Pascal's, objections to XQuery (lots of other
> thoughtful people have published on the futility of XML/XQuery, so you're
> free to pick another); then i'll listen to this drivel.

It's not drivel. It may or may not be wrong, but the person who wrote it is not a total fool.

You can strengthen your argument without resorting to name calling. Received on Sun Oct 24 2004 - 21:48:27 CEST

Original text of this message