dbf is antiquated right?
From: s <s_at_s.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:38:55 GMT
Message-ID: <jSJ3d.12732$yp2.11381_at_newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>
Is it safe to tell a client that the dbf format is a dinosaur compared to SQL? Client's using ACT (contact management app) and the dbf and/or indexes have become corrupt and are getting to be a time sink to keep working.
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:38:55 GMT
Message-ID: <jSJ3d.12732$yp2.11381_at_newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>
Is it safe to tell a client that the dbf format is a dinosaur compared to SQL? Client's using ACT (contact management app) and the dbf and/or indexes have become corrupt and are getting to be a time sink to keep working.
What tools could I use to tinker with it? Old version of FoxPro?
Received on Tue Sep 21 2004 - 01:38:55 CEST