Re: A Normalization Question
From: Alan <alan_at_erols.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:25:54 -0400
Message-ID: <2ll8l1Fdbp48U1_at_uni-berlin.de>
> Maybe my arguments lead YOU to believe that the only atomic
> information size is a bit. My arguments do not lead ME to believe that
> the only atomic information size is a bit. Bit is a hardware/physical
> layer issue. My data model (TM) can be implemented on hardware without
> bits and still represent the concept of bits, bytes, integers, hex,
> octal, decimal, etc in the logical layer of the db.
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:25:54 -0400
Message-ID: <2ll8l1Fdbp48U1_at_uni-berlin.de>
>
> Maybe my arguments lead YOU to believe that the only atomic
> information size is a bit. My arguments do not lead ME to believe that
> the only atomic information size is a bit. Bit is a hardware/physical
> layer issue. My data model (TM) can be implemented on hardware without
> bits and still represent the concept of bits, bytes, integers, hex,
> octal, decimal, etc in the logical layer of the db.
I suppose you have also discovered a method for cold fusion? Received on Wed Jul 14 2004 - 19:25:54 CEST