Re: Semi-structured data

From: Costin Cozianu <c_cozianu_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 13:06:00 -0700
Message-ID: <2k0qh9F15ijlnU1_at_uni-berlin.de>


Leandro Guimaraens Faria Corsetti Dutra wrote:
> Em Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:42:29 -0700, Costin Cozianu escreveu:
>
>

>>Semistructured data has an obvious meaning, usefulness and applications

>
>
> That being? Precisely, please.
>
>

Well, you can use some reading, can't you ?

Semi-structured means whose structure is only partially exposed to the processing application (where application can be database systems, client app, middleware, etc), i.e. it has hidden structure as far as the application is concerned.

>

>>which is accepted by the overwhelming majority of CS community.

>
>
> That says nothing about its preciseness or usefulness.

It says something very precise about the legitimacy of wannabe trolls on c.d.t who want to wave their magic hands and pretend there's some kind of truth or useful knowledge in their baseless claims.

> The
> majority of the CS community uses Oracle or MS SQL Server, or some
> other SQL flavour, on MS Windows; does not use functional programming
> nor relational database systems nor formal methods.
>
>

Falsehoods all over the place. There's no significant published research in database theory or any other branch of CS that "uses" Oracle or MS SQL Server, and all the other claims are trivially false and irrelevant. Who decreed that there's any good in the majority of CS community using FP languages ?

Just grow up, will you ? Comp.database.theory has been in useless troll mode for months now, and you can't in all honesty blame it all on Pick fans. Received on Thu Jun 24 2004 - 22:06:00 CEST

Original text of this message