Re: DMoz Relational Implementations category: chaff from wheat
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 14:17:54 -0500
Message-ID: <c9g0dp$5ko$1_at_news.netins.net>
"Leandro Guimaraens Faria Corsetti Dutra" <leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm> wrote
in message news:pan.2004.05.31.18.16.15.650351_at_dutra.fastmail.fm...
> I maintain the
> http://dmoz.org./Computers/Software/Databases/Relational category,
> including the Implementation subcategory.
>
> It has been a long time since I have wanted to check the
> 'relationalness' of several listed systems, but haven't neither the
> time nor the expertise.
>
> So I would like to ask someone more knowledgeable to take a
> look and tell me which systems should be considered 'quasi-relational'
> -- meaning not relational at all, but at least more interesting than
> SQL -- and which should be dumped altogether.
>
<snip>
Do you consider every database that speaks SQL to be relational? --dawn
Received on Mon May 31 2004 - 21:17:54 CEST