Re: DMoz Relational Implementations category: chaff from wheat

From: Dawn M. Wolthuis <>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 14:17:54 -0500
Message-ID: <c9g0dp$5ko$>

"Leandro Guimaraens Faria Corsetti Dutra" <> wrote in message
> I maintain the
> category,
> including the Implementation subcategory.
> It has been a long time since I have wanted to check the
> 'relationalness' of several listed systems, but haven't neither the
> time nor the expertise.
> So I would like to ask someone more knowledgeable to take a
> look and tell me which systems should be considered 'quasi-relational'
> -- meaning not relational at all, but at least more interesting than
> SQL -- and which should be dumped altogether.
Do you consider every database that speaks SQL to be relational? --dawn Received on Mon May 31 2004 - 21:17:54 CEST

Original text of this message