| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Ah, but who has better parties?
Leandro Guimaraens Faria Corsetti Dutra <leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm>
wrote:
>Em Tue, 25 May 2004 19:01:46 -0700, Gene Wirchenko escreveu:
>
>> xBASE does have SQL. Talking of converting from xBASE to SQL is
>> less than totally accurate.
>
> You are totally offbase. xBase as a language is not SQL, and
>is even less relational than SQL. Not only that, xBase *products*'s
Are you being deliberately obtuse? I have said that xBASE has SQL, not that it is SQL.
>SQL flavours and capabilities suffer from having to support
>navigational access too.
I find that having the two approaches is a strength. xBASE record-oriented commands are very useful with a result set.
> Keep insisting this and I will be forced to ignore you, as I
>am doing already with the other non-relational ignarii.
Something like throwing a hissy fit? Well, if you must.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences.
You have biases.
He/She has prejudices.
Received on Wed May 26 2004 - 11:28:50 CDT
![]() |
![]() |