Re: Ah, but who has better parties?
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 15:13:05 GMT
Message-ID: <5gMoc.36656$TT.4123_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au>
"Leandro Guimarăes Faria Corsetti Dutra" <leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm> wrote
in message news:pan.2004.05.13.12.08.23.162778_at_dutra.fastmail.fm...
> Em Wed, 12 May 2004 21:29:42 -0500, Dawn M. Wolthuis escreveu:
>
> > I hope you can see that the point I'm making is that there is some
> > aspect of personality involved in what approaches are taken to
> > addressing similar problems
>
> I am finding your lack of understanding of *the problem*
> tiresome.
But what of your lack in the
understanding of *the personality*?
Modern database theory espoused by Date is a 1970's theory. It is devoid of personality because it considers an inanimate system that does not live and breathe, and ignores *the problem* of industry and business.
> See the name of the newsgroup. c.d.*theory*.
Why dont you play a spelling card,
or a caps-lock card?
> If personality is relevant to Science, it is not Science but
> Postmodernism.
>
> But then perhaps you're Postmodernist.
>
> Or not quite Postmodernist, just popular Anglo-Saxon with the
> typical contempt for Science and infatuation with pragmatism.
Pete Brown
Falls Creek
Oz
Received on Thu May 13 2004 - 17:13:05 CEST