Re: Noninferential vs. inferential DBMS

alfredo_at_ncs.es (Alfredo Novoa) wrote:

>On Thu, 13 May 2004 11:43:43 +0300, "x" <x-false_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>**** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
>>
>>
>>> Is a non-inferential DBMS really a DBMS ?
>>
>>Nobody has any opinon on the above ?
>
>Of course a DBMS could be "non-inferential". It is a too trivial
>question.

     That was not the question though. OP asked "is" not "could be"? To answer the question asked requires a proof. To say yes to your version requires but one example. So, of course, your simpler version is trivial. What about the original question?

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:

     I have preferences.
     You have biases.
     He/She has prejudices.