Re: Ah, but who has better parties?

From: Tony <andrewst_at_onetel.net.uk>
Date: 13 May 2004 02:13:42 -0700
Message-ID: <c0e3f26e.0405130113.546a8afe_at_posting.google.com>


"Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote in message news:<c7umiq$8j$1_at_news.netins.net>...
> "Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra" <leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm> wrote
> in message news:pan.2004.05.13.01.16.06.50324_at_dutra.fastmail.fm...
> > Em Wed, 12 May 2004 19:11:11 -0500, Dawn M. Wolthuis escreveu:
> >
> > > The dress is not casual by any stretch
> >
> > OT and frivolous your posting... and dead wrong. At least me
> > and Fabian Pascal I know for sure to be casual dressers. And you
> > obviously never saw a photo of Date.
>
> And you are suggesting that the three of you would have been the party
> planners or that you would have violated the suggested attire? OK, I
> realize that I did forget to mention the negativity, but there was plenty to
> go around at both parties.
>
> And YOU might think this irrelevant, but I hope you can see that the point
> I'm making is that there is some aspect of personality involved in what
> approaches are taken to addressing similar problems.
> Cheers! --dawn

So the moral is: hire Pickies to organize your parties but keep them well away from your data, and hire Relationalists to design your databases but don't invite them to your parties. Right? ;-) Received on Thu May 13 2004 - 11:13:42 CEST

Original text of this message