Re: c.d.theory glossary - NULL

From: Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra <>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 14:26:30 -0300
Message-ID: <>

Em Sat, 24 Apr 2004 11:09:44 -0400, Laconic2 escreveu:

> Second, the NULL marker (bit, if you like) is far from the insanity bit.

        It is.

> In most cases where it's used, it's more like the humility bit. The
> database doesn't know everything, and admitting that fact, where
> relevant, is better than making a random assertion of something for
> which there is no evidence.

        You can do that much better with special values.

> Some cells should have default values, but some should not.

        That's orthogonal.

> Next, NULL is not a value. I don't care what Date or Kimball say on
> the subject. They don't know nothing.

        By saying that you prove they (or Date, at least) do and you don't. Date agree NULL is not a value.

Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra           +55 (11) 5685 2219
Av Sgto Geraldo Santana, 1100 6/71               +55 (11) 5686 9607
04.674-000  São Paulo, SP                                    BRASIL
Received on Sat Apr 24 2004 - 19:26:30 CEST

Original text of this message