Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Date's First Great Blunder

Re: Date's First Great Blunder

From: Anthony W. Youngman <wol_at_thewolery.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:44:34 +0100
Message-ID: <$Aj4L5DCMrhAFwEQ@thewolery.demon.co.uk>


In message <c5oj0f$255$1_at_news.netins.net>, Dawn M. Wolthuis <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> writes
>> >I am an example of someone who has used Oracle, SQL Server, My SQL, and
>> >PostgreSQL and much prefer the data model of the U2 databases (UniVerse
>and
>> >UniData). Why? Because I care about the cost of ownership for the
>overall
>> >software solutions over time. I am not alone in knowing and using
>> >relational databases and prefering not to.
>>
>> None of the above is a RDBMS and My SQL is not a DBMS at all.
>
>So, we have a theory and no implementations so it is impossible for us to
>know whether the theory is useful or not? I won't hold my breath for an
>actual consumer product that is deemed good enough for us to test the
>theory. And, by the way, since Codd's first relational theory paper was
>published by ACM in 1970, what is keeping us from having an implementation
>these many years later? I'll admit there are no perfect PICK
>implementations by a long stretch, but the first implementation of it was,
>indeed, an implementation.

I'll repeat myself :-)

Relational is so simple, that in 30 years we STILL don't have a proper implementation of it?

Cheers,
Wol

-- 
Anthony W. Youngman - wol at thewolery dot demon dot co dot uk
HEX wondered how much he should tell the Wizards. He felt it would not be a
good idea to burden them with too much input. Hex always thought of his reports
as Lies-to-People.
The Science of Discworld : (c) Terry Pratchett 1999
Received on Wed Apr 21 2004 - 12:44:34 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US