Re: Date's First Great Blunder
From: Dawn M. Wolthuis <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:23:48 -0500
Message-ID: <c69k6j$un6$1_at_news.netins.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:23:48 -0500
Message-ID: <c69k6j$un6$1_at_news.netins.net>
"Paul" <paul_at_test.com> wrote in message
news:LjYhc.35899$Y%6.4692610_at_wards.force9.net...
> Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> > Relational is so simple, that in 30 years we STILL don't have a proper
> > implementation of it?
>
> Relational is simpler to the end user, but more complicated to the
> database management software.
From what I have seen, relational is definitely not simpler to the end-user of the dbms software (nor of any applications based on that software). Do you have any evidence to back up this claim? Thanks. --dawn Received on Fri Apr 23 2004 - 01:23:48 CEST