Oracle FAQ
Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
Home
->
Community
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
39 messages
:
Starting
Tue Mar 02 2004 - 02:00:42 CST,
Ending
Tue Mar 02 2004 - 23:05:54 CST
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Thread view
] [
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd?
Alfredo Novoa
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 03:42:22 CST)
Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd?
Tobias Faust
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 02:00:42 CST)
Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd?
Nigel Pendse
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 03:04:50 CST)
Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd?
Tobias Faust
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 03:58:31 CST)
Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd?
Tobias Faust
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 02:59:34 CST)
Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd?
fermat
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 05:18:31 CST)
Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd?
Tobias Faust
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 01:29:45 CST)
Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd?
Matthias Klaey
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 03:15:24 CST)
Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd?
Tobias Faust
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 08:01:16 CST)
Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd?
Matthias Klaey
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 08:58:33 CST)
Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory"))
Alfredo Novoa
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 03:55:32 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Tony
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 05:40:00 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:45:53 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Tony
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:20:21 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:13:29 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Roy Hann
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 03:45:23 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 12:50:10 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Roy Hann
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 15:11:30 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 15:30:37 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Roy Hann
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 06:21:59 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 07:22:43 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Roy Hann
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 07:43:15 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Marshall Spight
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 22:48:27 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 18:11:18 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
mountain man
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 04:37:00 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Alfredo Novoa
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 11:47:32 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Tony
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 05:55:55 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 12:53:06 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Paul
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 15:04:47 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Tony
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 05:11:11 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Paul
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 18:40:52 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
mountain man
(Sat Mar 06 2004 - 00:41:41 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Bob Badour
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 17:06:26 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Tony
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 09:11:08 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Tony
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 05:28:29 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Dataman
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 08:05:44 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Tony
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 04:48:49 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
mountain man
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 01:54:40 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 04:34:54 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Bob Badour
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 17:08:48 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Alfredo Novoa
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 04:01:16 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
ben brugman
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 04:15:40 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Alfredo Novoa
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 06:18:46 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
ben brugman
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 07:10:21 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
ben brugman
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 08:19:07 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Alfredo Novoa
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:22:28 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
ben brugman
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:52:26 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Bob Badour
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 17:11:16 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
ben brugman
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 03:59:53 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 09 2004 - 20:58:46 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
mountain man
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 01:54:39 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
ben brugman
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 04:05:01 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
mountain man
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 01:29:35 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
ben brugman
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 11:44:23 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
mountain man
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 18:21:12 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
ben brugman
(Sun Mar 07 2004 - 07:15:23 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:13:53 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Alfredo Novoa
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:31:05 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Dataman
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 08:36:13 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Jonathan Leffler
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:06:19 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
ben brugman
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:45:32 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:23:56 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
ben brugman
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:43:57 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Christopher Browne
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:52:36 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Bob Badour
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 17:05:34 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:45:28 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
mountain man
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 01:54:38 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
Alfredo Novoa
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 04:36:55 CST)
Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?
--CELKO--
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:02:15 CST)
Re: Lots of code. How many tables.
Keith Johnson
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:54:15 CST)
2004 SIGMOD Awards
Moshe Vardi
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 17:18:23 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Neo
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:40:06 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:48:08 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Neo
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 09:10:05 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 11:26:50 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Neo
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 18:52:28 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 19:52:52 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Neo
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:48:30 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 13:36:08 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
--CELKO--
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 16:30:56 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Neo
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 14:47:18 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 15:49:08 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Neo
(Sat Mar 06 2004 - 00:51:50 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Neo
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 15:41:23 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 16:16:06 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Neo
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 23:24:12 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Marshall Spight
(Mon Mar 08 2004 - 02:18:45 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Neo
(Mon Mar 08 2004 - 13:08:44 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Marshall Spight
(Tue Mar 09 2004 - 22:32:48 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Neo
(Wed Mar 10 2004 - 13:06:46 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Neo
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 23:43:00 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Neo
(Sat Mar 06 2004 - 00:35:48 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Mikito Harakiri
(Sat Mar 06 2004 - 14:10:03 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Robert Stearns
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 08:44:49 CST)
Re: Tree (forest) design
Neo
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 13:09:42 CST)
Xquery might have some things right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:10:57 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Christopher Browne
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:06:07 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Leandro Dutra
(Wed Mar 24 2004 - 06:09:34 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Christopher Browne
(Sun Mar 28 2004 - 22:09:29 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Sun Mar 28 2004 - 22:48:39 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 22:27:10 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Christopher Browne
(Tue Mar 02 2004 - 23:05:54 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Tony
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 10:16:22 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:53:53 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:49:01 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Roy Hann
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 03:54:07 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 09:43:20 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Marshall Spight
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 22:53:55 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 07:33:40 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Corey Brown
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 18:35:46 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Tony
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 06:02:14 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 09:57:37 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Tony
(Wed Mar 03 2004 - 15:35:47 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:56:33 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:40:39 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Mikito Harakiri
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 15:28:03 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Corey Brown
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 07:11:43 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 07:36:09 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Corey Brown
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 08:37:03 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 08:49:03 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Corey Brown
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 09:41:30 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 10:41:57 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 10:55:35 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Marshall Spight
(Fri Mar 12 2004 - 10:49:21 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Fri Mar 12 2004 - 13:01:01 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Hiran Chaudhuri
(Mon Mar 15 2004 - 15:49:17 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Mar 15 2004 - 16:07:09 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Hiran Chaudhuri
(Tue Mar 16 2004 - 13:43:20 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Mar 16 2004 - 13:53:15 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Hiran Chaudhuri
(Tue Mar 16 2004 - 14:03:56 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
mountain man
(Mon Mar 15 2004 - 17:42:02 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Hiran Chaudhuri
(Tue Mar 16 2004 - 13:49:56 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Mar 16 2004 - 13:58:30 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Hiran Chaudhuri
(Tue Mar 16 2004 - 14:07:50 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Mikito Harakiri
(Tue Mar 16 2004 - 14:19:34 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Christopher Browne
(Tue Mar 16 2004 - 21:40:48 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:08:05 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Alfredo Novoa
(Fri Mar 19 2004 - 12:21:58 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Tom Hester
(Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:08:40 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 19 2004 - 13:16:50 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:05:53 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Bob Badour
(Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:06:45 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 11:47:14 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 12:12:06 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Joe \
(Sun Mar 21 2004 - 20:02:15 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Mon Mar 22 2004 - 08:27:17 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Mar 22 2004 - 18:45:56 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Tony
(Tue Mar 23 2004 - 04:01:40 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Tue Mar 23 2004 - 08:20:07 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Mar 23 2004 - 22:15:08 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Wed Mar 24 2004 - 09:14:07 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Mar 24 2004 - 12:17:30 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Wed Mar 24 2004 - 14:31:13 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Mikito Harakiri
(Wed Mar 24 2004 - 15:26:59 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
D Guntermann
(Mon Mar 29 2004 - 22:13:03 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 11:52:34 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Corey Brown
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 12:58:21 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 13:45:38 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 13:57:05 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Corey Brown
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 18:31:37 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 19:15:10 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Corey Brown
(Sat Mar 06 2004 - 09:37:06 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Mikito Harakiri
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 19:34:47 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Corey Brown
(Sat Mar 06 2004 - 09:32:42 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Marshall Spight
(Fri Mar 12 2004 - 10:54:32 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Bob Badour
(Fri Mar 12 2004 - 12:19:25 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Mikito Harakiri
(Sat Mar 06 2004 - 14:02:15 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Corey Brown
(Sat Mar 06 2004 - 17:04:42 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Mikito Harakiri
(Sun Mar 07 2004 - 02:42:05 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Corey Brown
(Sun Mar 07 2004 - 07:31:10 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Mon Mar 08 2004 - 08:32:10 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Mikito Harakiri
(Mon Mar 08 2004 - 11:31:07 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Mon Mar 08 2004 - 21:39:17 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Tue Mar 09 2004 - 09:00:19 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Mar 09 2004 - 09:43:17 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Tue Mar 09 2004 - 13:30:22 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:57:45 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Peter Koch Larsen
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 09:36:36 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Fri Mar 05 2004 - 11:06:11 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Bob Badour
(Tue Mar 09 2004 - 20:37:02 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Tue Mar 09 2004 - 21:25:59 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Archibald Tuttle
(Wed Mar 10 2004 - 05:30:21 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Marshall Spight
(Sat Mar 13 2004 - 11:30:35 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Wed Mar 10 2004 - 07:24:38 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Marshall Spight
(Sat Mar 13 2004 - 11:33:34 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
mAsterdam
(Wed Mar 10 2004 - 07:58:51 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Eric Kaun
(Wed Mar 10 2004 - 10:17:35 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Dawn M. Wolthuis
(Wed Mar 10 2004 - 11:53:43 CST)
Re: Xquery might have some things right
Tom Hester
(Wed Mar 10 2004 - 15:57:39 CST)
Last message date
:
Tue Mar 02 2004 - 23:05:54 CST
Archived on
: Wed Mar 31 2004 - 18:21:02 CST
39 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Thread view
] [
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US