Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ?

From: Tony <andrewst_at_onetel.net.uk>
Date: 2 Mar 2004 12:20:21 -0800
Message-ID: <c0e3f26e.0403021220.53efd38e_at_posting.google.com>


"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message news:<GdSdncxns7j2Mdnd4p2dnA_at_golden.net>...
> "Tony" <andrewst_at_onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
> news:c0e3f26e.0403020340.276d887d_at_posting.google.com...
> > "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
> news:<FcydneN9COOZk9ndRVn-ug_at_golden.net>...
> > > "ben brugman" <ben_at_niethier.nl> wrote in message
> > > news:c2094f$q3$1_at_reader08.wxs.nl...
> > > > The implementation has to be done in Oracle or SQL-server.
> > >
> > > This has nothing to with difficulty, but with a poor choice of dbms.
> >
> > What would be a good choice? I understand where you are coming from
> > (SQL databases are not relational, etc.) but what is the available
> > alternative?
>
> The relational model.

But the relational model isn't a product is it? You said Oracle and SQL-Server are a "poor choice of dbms". I meant: what would be a good choice of dbms - I mean, one that someone could buy, install and use this year? Received on Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:20:21 CET

Original text of this message