Re: object algebra
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:17:56 -0800
Message-ID: <QZR_b.37$kg3.206_at_news.oracle.com>
"Eric Kaun" <ekaun_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bHP_b.17521$%p4.2788_at_newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
> If Mary has no eyes, then the definition of a person as having eyes is
> flawed.
The c.d.t actively promotes and is committed to ensure a work environment that is free from any discriminatory influence be it actual or perceived. As such, it is the c.d.t expectation that our posters make a concentrated effort to ensure that any article that are provided to c.d.t. do not possess or portray an image that may be construed as offensive or defamatory in nature.
One such recent example included the posts where the words "no eye" appeared to identify the female sources. Based on the cultural diversity and sensitivity of c.d.t., this is not an acceptable identification label.
We would request that each poster review, identify and remove/change any identification or labeling of terms or schema thereof that could be interpreted as discriminatory or offensive in nature before such article is posted or otherwise provided to any c.d.t. thread.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance. Received on Wed Feb 25 2004 - 01:17:56 CET