Re: object algebra

"Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri_at_iahu.com> wrote in message news:QZR_b.37$kg3.206_at_news.oracle.com...
> "Eric Kaun" <ekaun_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:bHP_b.17521$%p4.2788_at_newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
> > If Mary has no eyes, then the definition of a person as having eyes is
> > flawed.
>
> The c.d.t actively promotes and is committed to ensure a work environment
> that is free from any discriminatory influence be it actual or perceived.
As
> such, it is the c.d.t expectation that our posters make a concentrated
> effort to ensure that any article that are provided to c.d.t. do not
possess
> or portray an image that may be construed as offensive or defamatory in
> nature.
>
> One such recent example included the posts where the words "no eye"
appeared
> to identify the female sources. Based on the cultural diversity and
> sensitivity of c.d.t., this is not an acceptable identification label.
>
> We would request that each poster review, identify and remove/change any
> identification or labeling of terms or schema thereof that could be
> interpreted as discriminatory or offensive in nature before such article
is
> posted or otherwise provided to any c.d.t. thread.
>
> Thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance.

Is this a joke? Seriously - you're kidding, right?

If I labeled, stereotyped, portrayed offensive images, etc., kindly point them out. The quoted text above is evidence of none of those, as far as I can tell. The inference is yours, and based on no implication of mine.

• Eric