Re: LM structure question

From: Lee Johnson <lee_at_fake.notreal.leejohnson.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:43:56 GMT
Message-ID: <MCdsb.29783$jy.21698_at_clgrps13>


I will thanks.

Lee

"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message news:lsSdnZ8tP7yLwSyiRVn-vA_at_golden.net...
> "Lee Johnson" <lee_at_fake.notreal.leejohnson.net> wrote in message
> news:Tjcsb.28913$jy.5958_at_clgrps13...
> > I have a table called MEMBER, VOLUNTEER, DONOR.
> >
> > Members coud be volunteers and/or donors or simply a member.
Conversely,
> a
> > volunteer and/or donor does not have to be a member. what is the best
way
> > to structure this? Each item in the table will have phone numbers and
> > addresses attached to it as well as activities. Would an entity
entitled
> > PERSON which is then identified (not sure how) as being a member and/or
a
> > volunteer and/or a donor be appropriate? keeping in mind of course that
a
> > person who is member and a donor would have things like membership
number,
> a
> > donor history and such whereas if he was just a donor he would only have
a
> > donor id or something.
>
> I suggest you locate a copy of Fabian Pascal's _Practical Issues..._ book
> and read it.
>
>
Received on Tue Nov 11 2003 - 23:43:56 CET

Original text of this message