Level of Abuse
From: cmurthi <xyzcmurthi_at_quest.with.a.w.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:14:45 -0500
Message-ID: <3FA12AE5.8040507_at_quest.with.a.w.net>
>
>
> While my dick may be smaller than average, I don't think I would call
> it very small. I haven't had any complaints, if that's any indication.
> It's certainly no more than a standard deviation from the average, and
> I suspect most women would agree it's not the most important tool on
> the bench in any case. In fact, I suspect most women would agree
> lovemaking is another area where education and intelligence are
> paramount.
>
> Besides, I have already compensated with my F350 Crew Cab XL dually so
> I have little need for a Napoleonic complex. And it doesn't require
> such a complex to observe that a person making obviously ignorant and
> stupid public statements is both ignorant and stupid. Given that I
> find it unethical and immoral for such an ignorant and stupid person
> to practise, I consider it a public service.
>
> Do you have anything to share that's relevant to the topic of the
> foundations of your practice?
Received on Thu Oct 30 2003 - 16:14:45 CET
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:14:45 -0500
Message-ID: <3FA12AE5.8040507_at_quest.with.a.w.net>
I have a question for you cdt-ers: is there any level of invective and abuse that you guys (and gals) will not tolerate? In other words, is there anyone there who can tell these cretins where to get off, at least for the good of your "community?" Or do totally cow you? It's a sad commentary on the nature of debate in the theoretical world.
Oh by the way, Jeffrey, I can say "told ya so!".
Chandru Murthi
Bob Badour wrote:
> "Jeffrey Kaufman" <jeffreykaufman_at_sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:<MkRnb.4535$cn2.1524_at_newssvr25.news.prodigy.com>...
>
>>"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message >>news:cd3b3cf.0310290621.67fed43_at_posting.google.com... >>[snip] >> >>>You are not only ignorant but apparently quite stupid as well. I still >>>wonder: Does Pick attract ignorant, stupid people? Or does it make >>>people stupid? >> >>You must either be very short or have a very small dick to have such a >>massive Napoleonic complex.
>
>
> While my dick may be smaller than average, I don't think I would call
> it very small. I haven't had any complaints, if that's any indication.
> It's certainly no more than a standard deviation from the average, and
> I suspect most women would agree it's not the most important tool on
> the bench in any case. In fact, I suspect most women would agree
> lovemaking is another area where education and intelligence are
> paramount.
>
> Besides, I have already compensated with my F350 Crew Cab XL dually so
> I have little need for a Napoleonic complex. And it doesn't require
> such a complex to observe that a person making obviously ignorant and
> stupid public statements is both ignorant and stupid. Given that I
> find it unethical and immoral for such an ignorant and stupid person
> to practise, I consider it a public service.
>
> Do you have anything to share that's relevant to the topic of the
> foundations of your practice?
Received on Thu Oct 30 2003 - 16:14:45 CET