Re: Dropping ACID - was Re: does a table always need a PK?
From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne_at_acm.org>
Date: 31 Aug 2003 16:49:24 GMT
Message-ID: <bit8uk$co580$1_at_ID-125932.news.uni-berlin.de>
Date: 31 Aug 2003 16:49:24 GMT
Message-ID: <bit8uk$co580$1_at_ID-125932.news.uni-berlin.de>
Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net>wrote:
> "Christopher Browne" <cbbrowne_at_acm.org> wrote in message
> news:bircns$ccakp$1_at_ID-125932.news.uni-berlin.de...
>> It will take a good deal more
>> than that to satisfactorily justify it being a good idea to drop ACID
>> altogether.
>
> I had to read that twice. The first time I somehow perceived it as saying
> something about "being a good idea to drop ACID together", which has a
> strangely different meaning.
Too much LDS in the '60s? (Which might take memory back to the Star Trek comedy, _Star Trek IV, The Voyage Home_...)
-- output = ("cbbrowne" "_at_" "acm.org") http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/sap.html Rules of the Evil Overlord #148. "Before ridiculing my enemies for wasting time on a device to stop me that couldn't possibly work, I will first acquire a copy of the schematics and make sure that in fact it couldn't possibly work." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>Received on Sun Aug 31 2003 - 18:49:24 CEST