comp.databases.theory: by thread

Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Lauri Pietarinen (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 01:36:05 CST)
- Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Steve Kass (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 02:32:49 CST)
  - Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Lauri Pietarinen (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 03:25:45 CST)
    - Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Paul Vernon (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:18:28 CST)
      - Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Lauri Pietarinen (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 06:31:19 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Paul Vernon (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:17:13 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Lauri Pietarinen (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:55:25 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Jan Hidders (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 05:00:02 CST)
- Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Lauri Pietarinen (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 10:14:28 CST)
  - Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Jan Hidders (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 16:10:12 CST)
    - Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Lauri Pietarinen (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 00:32:03 CST)
      - Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Jan Hidders (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 02:57:45 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Lauri Pietarinen (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 06:22:01 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Jan Hidders (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 08:06:21 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Lauri Pietarinen (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 12:14:31 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Lauri Pietarinen (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 12:14:40 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Lauri Pietarinen (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 15:25:26 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Jan Hidders (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 04:01:14 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Lauri Pietarinen (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:03:42 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Jan Hidders (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:23:29 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Lauri Pietarinen (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:52:21 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Lauri Pietarinen (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 02:05:13 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Jan Hidders (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 06:44:22 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Bob Badour (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:40:45 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Jan Hidders (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:11:53 CST)
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Lauri Pietarinen (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:54:58 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Jan Hidders (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:03:39 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Bob Badour (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 09:56:40 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Jan Hidders (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:21:27 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Bob Badour (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:45:47 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Jan Hidders (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:23:11 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Bob Badour (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:44:17 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Jan Hidders (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 01:31:17 CST)
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Mikito Harakiri (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:16:42 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Jan Hidders (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:40:51 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Mikito Harakiri (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:27:46 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Jan Hidders (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 17:04:53 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Bob Badour (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:51:57 CST)
        
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Jan Hidders (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 01:35:08 CST)
        Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Lauri Pietarinen (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:45:06 CST)
    - Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Bob Badour (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:41:21 CST)
      - Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Jan Hidders (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:55:32 CST)
- Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Lauri Pietarinen (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:24:40 CST)
  - Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Jan Hidders (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:14:55 CST)
Re: Extending my question. Was: The relational model and relational algebra - why did SQL become the industry standard? Bob Badour (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:28:13 CST)
Re: How to store temporal info? Lennart Jonsson (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 03:33:21 CST)
- Re: How to store temporal info? John Gilson (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 08:18:49 CST)
  - Re: How to store temporal info? Lennart Jonsson (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:38:05 CST)
    - Re: How to store temporal info? John Gilson (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 13:43:53 CST)
      - Re: How to store temporal info? Lennart Jonsson (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 14:36:40 CST)
        
        Re: How to store temporal info? Alan Gutierrez (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 16:03:05 CST)
        
        Re: How to store temporal info? OlegJay (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:47:04 CST)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy hs (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 16:54:38 CST)
- Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy karl wettin (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 19:24:23 CST)
Re: Setting parameters at Hierarchy within a hierarchy --CELKO-- (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 18:55:54 CST)
Re: When and when not to put information in a database. Steve Kass (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 01:31:41 CST)
- Re: When and when not to put information in a database. Jesse (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 03:15:27 CST)
Need help/advice for database structure Oodie (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 00:02:46 CST)
- Re: Need help/advice for database structure Steve Kass (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 01:41:43 CST)
- Re: Need help/advice for database structure JL (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 07:29:56 CST)
- Re: Need help/advice for database structure Paul Vernon (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:51:24 CST)
Re: Hierarchical data Christian Wagner (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 02:21:04 CST)
Re: primary key - tag numbers tretasdehr (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 05:13:23 CST)
One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution nippur (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 12:09:30 CST)
- Re: One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution John Gilson (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 14:12:04 CST)
- Re: One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution --CELKO-- (Mon Mar 03 2003 - 19:18:51 CST)
  - Re: One-to-many relationship, non-equality join criteria. Can't come up with a decent solution nippur (Tue Mar 04 2003 - 07:29:15 CST)