Re: Normalizing the ER model

From: Greg Boland <gregb_at_snet.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 23:18:44 GMT
Message-ID: <ox9J9.3266$cM7.860662912_at_newssvr10.news.prodigy.com>


"Costin Cozianu" <c_cozianu_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:assat7$t32r6$1_at_ID-152540.news.dfncis.de...
> Greg Boland wrote:
> > Really? Can you give an example of an ER diagram that is in some normal
form
> > and for which the straightforward mapping to the relational model is not
in
> > the same normal form?
> > <clipped>
> >
> > Jan,
> >
> > I'm saying there is no such thing as an ERD in first, second, third or
any
> > form in the context we're discussing. What don't you understand? In this
> > discussion you are revealing what you don't know.
> >
> > Greg
> >
> >
>
> Greg,
>
> It is time to give Jan a break, and go get some book to study. Make sure
> you get a good one :)
>
> I'm sure Jan is willing to help you with whatever you don't understand,
> including giving examples, and spoon feeding you basic computer science
> over the usenet, as he did for many others.
>
> But you'll have to learn how to ask. Saying "please" can help.
>
> Costin
>

 I have a firm foundation in the theory. And he doesn't need your help to defend himself. I was answering a question, and King still has it right. So in that context "please" is useless.

Best Regards,

Greg Received on Tue Dec 10 2002 - 00:18:44 CET

Original text of this message