Re: Business-logic in 3-tier architecture

From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_at_nospam_ncs.es>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 00:13:01 GMT
Message-ID: <3daa8aad.599512_at_newscache4.freenet.de>

On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 09:01:36 +1000, "mountain man" <prfbrown_at_magna.com.au> wrote:

>> Declaring business rules with a very high level language instead
>> coding it in a low level language is not complicating things, it is
>> simplifying things.
>
>This high level language ... this is in addition to some
>client application software, or is a replacement for the
>standard business software application?

No this language is SQL or replacement of SQL. Received on Tue Oct 15 2002 - 02:13:01 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Alan Po: "How to create a DBMS from scratch?"
Previous message: Tobin Harris: "Re: What's the point ?"
Maybe in reply to: Arthur Yeo: "Business-logic in 3-tier architecture"
In reply to Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Business-logic in 3-tier architecture"
Next in thread: Marshall Spight: "Re: Celko: help with an experiment"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message