Re: The Foundation of OO (XDb)

From: James <jraustin1_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 12 Jun 2002 23:07:43 -0700
Message-ID: <a6e74506.0206122207.5d7a66de_at_posting.google.com>


"Daniel T." <notdanielt3_at_gte.net> wrote in message news:<notdanielt3-888B44.13123811062002_at_news.bellatlantic.net>...
> jraustin1_at_hotmail.com (James) wrote:
>
> >The object is the fundamental atomic thing.
> >An object can represents anything: a number, a word, a person, a car,
> >a sound, a picture, a movie, a smell, a feeling, an idea, etc.
> >An object can have instances.
> >An instance is an object that has a class.
> >A class is an object that has instances.
> >
> >An object inherits the non-overridden properties
> >and methods of its ancestor classes.
> >An object can override/add properties and methods.
> >
> >(www.xdb1.com)
>
> Was there some point you were trying to make? Because if there was, I
> missed it...

Proposing a slight modification of the current conventional OO Model which I believe will have a significant positive impact. The slight change is that an instance can have instances and so on. Received on Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:07:43 CEST

Original text of this message