Re: Throughput and storage requirements questions for modern vs old database processing apps

From: Jim Kennedy <kennedy-family_at_home.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 21:56:57 GMT
Message-ID: <JOdM7.77775$XJ4.41762571_at_news1.sttln1.wa.home.com>


You can use a lot of tools to export the data out of Clipper. e.g. Access, Dbase, Even Excel. It is just DBF files. Jim

"John Becich" <jbecich_at_nospam.net> wrote in message news:gucM7.5155$Kc2.541881_at_newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
>
> "Paul Linehan" <plinehan_at_not.a.chance.ie> wrote in message
> news:3c010367.15054479_at_news1.eircom.net...
> >
> > "John Becich" <jbecich_at_nospam.net> wrote:
>
> > Make sure that they'll give you the source code of the application
> > (sign an nda if necessary) and make sure that you can obtain a copy of
> > the development environment - I looked on the proiv site and can't
> > seem to find the pricing.
> Is that some sort of a doomsday defense strategy, in case the vendor
> disappears? You've got a good point, BTW. I'm not sure my client wants
to
> engender the responsibility of holding that source code. My strategy so
far
> has been to insist, from any candidate, that the new software have the
> ability to export its data to some format that allows a subsequent
> migration. Our existing system lacks that, so pulling the data out will
be
> a considerable job. I've done that before, writing C code to mechanize
the
> process of pulling data from weird places.
>
> >
> > >Given that the two offerings I have reviewed promise to be "highly
> > >configurable by the user," with "additional customization available by
> the
> > >manufacturer,"
> >
> >
> > Which will cost money?
> Of course.
> >
>
> > if you had the source of your
> > Clipper app, it would be relatively easy to port it to another
> > environment (like Delphi...).
>
> Tell me more. I can communicate with the author. He's still around. But
> what would Delphi do for us? At least it might be a means of exporting
the
> data from the old system to flat, delimited text files.
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Sun Nov 25 2001 - 22:56:57 CET

Original text of this message