Re: Finding matching ranges
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 00:07:24 GMT
Message-ID: <0HUT6.362$pb1.7720_at_www.newsranger.com>
In article <3b200b71.27893819_at_news.gte.net>, JRStern says...
>
>On Thu, 07 Jun 2001 21:55:04 GMT, Mikito Harakiri
><nospam_at_newsranger.com> wrote:
>>>You're probably best off letting the computer earn its keep. Buy some
>>>more RAM if you must. End of problem, for the most part.
>>
>>You are kidding right? If I ask you how to find a person by name, case ignored,
>>what index should I introduce, would your ahswer still be "to buy more RAM":-?
>
>My answer pertained to a problem that stretches relational capability
>by refering to quantative issues and to a suggested solution that
>involves violating relational dogma and normalization by storing a
>functional value.
>
>I'll let you know if I'm kidding, meanwhile take careful notes, there
>may be a test.
>
Hmm... I still fail to notice what in the original post triggered you into
sarchastic state of mind. Maybe I need to borrow some sence of humor.
Received on Fri Jun 08 2001 - 02:07:24 CEST