Re: Finding matching ranges
From: Vadim Tropashko <nospam_at_newsranger.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 22:09:46 GMT
Message-ID: <KYST6.225$pb1.5456_at_www.newsranger.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 22:09:46 GMT
Message-ID: <KYST6.225$pb1.5456_at_www.newsranger.com>
In article <YKST6.216$pb1.5120_at_www.newsranger.com>, Mikito Harakiri says...
>
>As far as the original question is conserned, assuming that your problem has an
>indexing solution, it would be also applicable to spatial/temporary domain. The
>fact that spatial doesn't have widely recognised indexing mechanism (compared >to B-tree) sound like an indicator that your problem is hard.
>
Is there really a connection to spatial? In spatial we never compare x with y
and here we do (indirectly, of course).
Received on Fri Jun 08 2001 - 00:09:46 CEST