Re: sql vs oracle

From: Yuri Budilov <yuri.budilov_at_computershare.com.au>
Date: 1998/09/21
Message-ID: <906402187.810309_at_marvin.fmsc.com.au>#1/1

re: locking.

yes, MS SQL Server 7.0 has full row level locking, which is a very competitive implementation imo.

It is also considerably easier to use than both MS SQL6.5 and Oracle8 (on NT) imho. I refer to the DBA, deployment and application development using MS tools like VB, VC, ADO, ODBC.

--
Yuri Budilov (opinions are all mine and nobody's else)
Melbourne, Australia
Dave Oakleaf wrote in message <36041e8b.41053211_at_news.mcs.com>...


|On Wed, 16 Sep 1998 08:29:26 -0700, Naushi Hussain


|<naushi.hussain_at_alliedsignal.com> wrote:

|

|In fairness I think sql 7.0 will have row-level locking, but I haven't

|read much about it yet.

|

Received on Mon Sep 21 1998 - 00:00:00 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tricia Kha: "Randomize data from SQL statement"
Previous message: Dan Slater: "Row Level Locking"
Maybe in reply to: Naushi Hussain: "sql vs oracle"
In reply to Dave Oakleaf: "Re: sql vs oracle"
Next in thread: Tricia Kha: "Randomize data from SQL statement"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message