Re: complicated access-sql-oracle mix seeking advice

From: Steve Jorgensen <nospam_at_nospam.com>
Date: 1998/06/09
Message-ID: <01bd9344$a4df51c0$9001a8c0_at_developer1.intertecservices.com>#1/1


Sounds to me like a job for a good transaction-oriented multi-tier 4GL tool like Forte.

briansheehanABC_at_hotmail.com wrote in article <357c2cee.82956875_at_news.cableinet.net>...
> I've been asked at work to give some advice on a proposed new
> database/timesheet system, we will buy in programmers to do the task
> when necessary but right now we are looking for the right direction to
> move in.
>
> We are made up of eight regional offices with 10-15 people in each
> office, the offices are in major uk cities with our headoffice in
> London.
>
> We need to implement a series of databases that will manage
> timesheeting (probably through a front end like Timesheet
> Professional), fax distribution of press notices using fax server
> software, posting of press notices and other typical database use. At
> present we are linked to London by what's called a kilostream line.
>
> Office software is Windows 95 running on a Novell 4.1 netwok with all
> servers in london running either Novell and one or two may be running
> Unix. There are no NT servers at present.
>
> My gut feeling is to have a good SQL/Oracle database in London with
> users accessing the data through a web browser or through Crystal
> Reports. This would require quite a lot of visual basic and java
> scripting I suspect The alternative is to have seperate databases in
> each regional office updating and being updated by the one in London,
> but this to me seems a recipe for disaster if the network misbehaves.
>
> Can anyone give me some thoughts on the above in terms of suitable
> databases in London. Currently every member of staff has a copy of
> access97 on their pc, but I know it's not geared up to handling a job
> of this size.
>
> I've got an open mind on this, I just what a feeling for what is best
> before hiring in consultants to do the job.
>
> Last point, we're government based so reasonable security is a
> requirement.
>
> Many thanks
>
>
Received on Tue Jun 09 1998 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message