Re: VB or PB???

From: Staf Van den Hooff <Staf.VanDenHooff_at_Ping.be>
Date: 1997/01/31
Message-ID: <01bc0fb8$5ea4f7c0$76014ac1_at_ping.be.ping.be>#1/1


I work as well with Delphi 2 as with Powerbuilder 5. I agree completely with Marcus.
If performance and openess are needed and reusability in different projects is important,
Delphi 2 is a much better choice.

Terry Garber <tgarber_at_richmond.infi.net> wrote in article <32f8e50a.76873130_at_news.infi.net>...
> wagnerc_at_teleport.com (Craig Wagner) wrote:
>
> >"Marcus Vinicius Neves" <mneves_at_sincout.com.br> wrote:
> >
> >>We do also business with PB 5, but we know that with Delphi 2 our
> >>"base objects for future projects" wil lbe much better and more
 powerful.
> >
> >Whenever I see an assertion like this, regardless of the product, I tend
 to
> >think it says more about the developer(s) than about the product.
> >---
>
> Especially since have base objects that are powerful and actually
 reusable has a
> lot more to do with the managing the objects and coding than the product
 used to
> do the work!
>
Received on Fri Jan 31 1997 - 00:00:00 CET

Original text of this message