Re: VB or PB???

Staf Van den Hooff wrote:
>
> I work as well with Delphi 2 as with Powerbuilder 5.
> I agree completely with Marcus.
> If performance and openess are needed and reusability in different projects
> is important,
> Delphi 2 is a much better choice.
>
> Terry Garber <tgarber_at_richmond.infi.net> wrote in article
> <32f8e50a.76873130_at_news.infi.net>...
> > wagnerc_at_teleport.com (Craig Wagner) wrote:
> >
> > >"Marcus Vinicius Neves" <mneves_at_sincout.com.br> wrote:
> > >
> > >>We do also business with PB 5, but we know that with Delphi 2 our
> > >>"base objects for future projects" wil lbe much better and more
 powerful.
> > >
> > >Whenever I see an assertion like this, regardless of the product, I tend
 to
> > >think it says more about the developer(s) than about the product.
> > >---
> >
> > Especially since have base objects that are powerful and actually
 reusable has a
> > lot more to do with the managing the objects and coding than the product
 used to
> > do the work!
> >

And you work with a WAN with several hundred users accessing the DB? And you see no performance hits with the increase in network traffic caused by Delphi?? Received on Fri Jan 31 1997 - 00:00:00 CET