Re: Developer/2000, Version 1.3; in 32-bit only version ??

...industry is not using Windows95...why port to it first? PB

In article <4llrtd$lp3_at_inet-nntp-gw-1.us.oracle.com>, Paul Zola <pzola_at_us.oracle.com> wrote:
>In <4lk3pk$bs5_at_airnews.iadfw.net> openshaw_at_airmail.net (Mike Openshaw) writes:
>
>} I real appreciate all the response to this inquiry; it's been a big
>} help.
>} However, I'm hoping to hear this from someone from oracle.com.
>
>DISCLAIMER: I AM NOT AN OFFICIAL SPOKESPERSON FOR ORACLE!
>
>My understanding of the current plans for Developer/2000 R1.3 are:
>
>The base development platform for Developer/2000 has been moved to
>32-bit Windows (either Windows 95 or Windows NT -- I'm not sure
>which). The initial release of Developer/2000 R1.3 will be a 32-bit
>port for Windows 95 and Windows NT. This version will be followed by a
>16-bit port for Windows 3.x, and by ports for UNIX and VMS Motif.
>
>Note that these plans are subject to change at any time.
>
>DISCLAIMER: I AM NOT AN OFFICIAL SPOKESPERSON FOR ORACLE!
>
>HTH.
>
>
>==============================================================================
>Paul Zola Technical Specialist
>World-Wide Technical Support Development Tools
>==============================================================================
>Computers possess the truly profound stupidity of the inanimate. - B. Sterling
>Disclaimer: Opinions and statements are mine, and do not necessarily
> reflect the opinions of Oracle Corporation.
Received on Thu Apr 25 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST