Re: Does anyone think this group needs splitting into subgroups?
Date: 1996/02/28
Message-ID: <4h1um7$pj0_at_meaddata.lexis-nexis.com>#1/1
A potential solution might be to request posters to abide by some amount of required info in the subject line, such as using some form of your suggested subgroups.
jb2_at_qdot.qld.gov.au (John Blackburn) wrote:
>Clint Redwood (clint_at_kheldar.demon.co.uk) wrote:
>: How about following subgroups?
>: forms
>: reports
>: dba
>: sql
>: jobs
>: etc...
>: I'd certainly make this group easier to read!
>: Yours
>: Clint.
>: --
>: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>: | Clint Redwood EMail clint_at_ |
>: | Mail sent via Demon Internet - Full IP for 10/Month Tel:0181 371 1234 |
>: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>Last time this came up, I suggested that rather than splitting the group,
>we need people to volunteer to maintain and regularly post FAQ's for the
>various topics rather than split the group. That way, someone could find
>the answer to their question by scaning the FAQ.
>
>I say reduce the traffic by reducing the number of "duplicated" threds!
>
>John.
>
>
>--
>
>John Blackburn Phone: +61 7 32534634
>jb2_at_qdot.qld.gov.au Fax: +61 7 38541194
>
>"Please enclose a stamped, self-addressed ethernet packet with
> all correspondence..."
>
>#include <std_disclaimers.h>
Received on Wed Feb 28 1996 - 00:00:00 CET