Re: Concurrent vs. Named Users
From: Strategic Data Systems <sds_at_dataplusnet.com>
Date: 1995/12/20
Message-ID: <4b9n9t$cmt_at_news.inc.net>#1/1
Scott Overby
sds_at_dataplusnet.com Received on Wed Dec 20 1995 - 00:00:00 CET
Date: 1995/12/20
Message-ID: <4b9n9t$cmt_at_news.inc.net>#1/1
In article <4b76h6$2jh_at_news-e1a.megaweb.com>, seatonco_at_ix.netcom.comð says...
>
>What are the pros and cons of using NAMED users over Concurrent users?
>
>Any insight that anyone can give me would be great.
>
On a peruser basis, NAMED users are cheaper.
So if you will have a set number of people using oracle regularly, NAMED is the choice,
If you have a lot of users who infrequently access Oracle, CONCURRENT might be the choice.
Scott Overby
sds_at_dataplusnet.com Received on Wed Dec 20 1995 - 00:00:00 CET