Re: Q: ODBC vs GLUE ?
From: Gary Gapinski <gapinski_at_lerc.nasa.gov>
Date: 1995/10/27
Message-ID: <46qv8m$qgk_at_bytor.lerc.nasa.gov>#1/1
Date: 1995/10/27
Message-ID: <46qv8m$qgk_at_bytor.lerc.nasa.gov>#1/1
In article <46o0hs$jld_at_life.ai.mit.edu>,
Sundar Narasimhan <sundar_at_ai.mit.edu> wrote:
>I'm surprised at the conclusion -- why isn't ODBC the preferred approach
>if portability to other databases is a consideration?
Hello, Sundar:
You are correct. What I should have said is that the creation of the application would be easier if an application development tool were used that provided a higher level of abstraction than ODBC (or Glue, for that matter).
Regards,
Gary
-- __________________________________________________________ Gary Gapinski email: gapinski_at_lerc.nasa.gov NASA Lewis Research Center voice: +1 216 433 5251Received on Fri Oct 27 1995 - 00:00:00 CET