Re: Do we choose ORACLE / DB2 6000 / Sybase???

In article <348mo5$6pk_at_search01.news.aol.com>, slurton_at_aol.com (Slurton) wrote:

> In article <344qks$45d_at_search01.news.aol.com>, thesasman_at_aol.com
> (TheSASMan) writes:
>
> Only one comment when IBM has to call their product DB2/6000 that should
> be a clue that the product may not be as flexable as you may want it to
> be. You may at a later date want to move the database off of a RISC 6000
> onto another platform even another IBM machine this may not be possible if
> IBM has gear this database to the RISC 6000.

IBM has announced and released versions of DB2 for Solaris and HP-UX also. It appears that they want to become a DB company also!

-- 
Paul Kamp
Pacer Software, Inc.
pgk_at_pacersoft.com
Applelink: PACER