Re: Does Oracle 10g make the Application Server (almost) insignificant?

From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:32:11 -0000
Message-ID: <402cdfeb$0$7072$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net>

[Quoted] "Ron" <support_at_dbainfopower.com> wrote in message news:tN-dndqjfsnhH7HdRVn-vA_at_comcast.com...
>
> Hello Roel,
>
> IMHO:
>
> For a big systems you still need to architect separate layers: you
may
> need 100-200 database servers, but multiple thousand's of application
> servers at least, separated by functionality, geo-location, etc.

If you have 100-200 database servers serving the same app, you have one hell [Quoted] of a bad app.

-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK

Received on Fri Feb 13 2004 - 15:32:11 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Miroslaw Rozpara: "question about Desiger"
Previous message: Niall Litchfield: "Re: Read username from OS"
Maybe in reply to: rcf<_no.SPAM_>: "Does Oracle 10g make the Application Server (almost) insignificant?"
In reply to Ron: "Re: Does Oracle 10g make the Application Server (almost) insignificant?"
Next in thread: Ron: "Re: Does Oracle 10g make the Application Server (almost) insignificant?"
Reply: Ron: "Re: Does Oracle 10g make the Application Server (almost) insignificant?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message