Re: RDF files v REP files
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 12:38:10 GMT
Message-ID: <3833f29e.8397328_at_news.logica.co.uk>
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999 08:18:45 -0800, Robert sharpe <robert.sharpeNOroSPAM_at_abbeynational.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
>Hi,
> Can some one please settle this arguement that we have between 2 of
>our contractors - we are developing in Forms 4.5 and Reports 2.5 16 bit
>under Windows 95, and we have a difference of opinion with our 2
>contractors. One says that we should release only the .RDF files to
>run against Oracle runtime, the other one says we should generate them
>and release the .REP files.
> Can some one give me their neutral opinion as to what is the best
>method as even I'm getting confused now.
>
>Thanks bob.....
>
>
>* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
>The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
>
The RDF file has a definition of your report in it, and is editable
for anyone with access to Reports. The REP file is a runtime-only
file, it can't be edited.
Jack Received on Thu Nov 18 1999 - 13:38:10 CET