Re: Reports 3.0 Matrix Report
From: Paul Dorsey <pdorsey_at_dulcian.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 22:11:58 GMT
Message-ID: <O8Zx3.6571$9K.7859_at_news.rdc1.nj.home.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 22:11:58 GMT
Message-ID: <O8Zx3.6571$9K.7859_at_news.rdc1.nj.home.com>
Sorting on any break group is unaffected by the order by in the underlying
query.
This is true if it is a matrix or any grouped report.
Sorting will be by the values of the break columns in the break group.
-- Paul Dorsey Dulcian, Inc. www.dulcian.com 212 595 7223 P.S. If you would like to talk to Dulcian about a salaried position on our team, please call me. We have openings in NJ for developers, in CA for PERL developers. Louise Weiler wrote in message ...Received on Sun Aug 29 1999 - 00:11:58 CEST
>I'm trying to create a matrix report in Reports 3.0. My query is a UNION
of
>two queries, with an explicit order by. (Basically, I want the results of
>the first query followed by the results of the second query.) However, in
>the matrix report, it appears that the order by is completely disregarded,
>and things are printed in strict ascending order.
>Is there a way around this (besides splitting my UNION into two queries,
>which makes the formatting go haywire)?
>Thanks for any info...
>Louise
>
>--
>-- Louise
>Louise J Weiler
>Ballston Lake, NY
>