Re: 10g data pump question
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:02:42 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <970bca27-797c-416f-92f9-9c7f399854a0@a26g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
On Nov 24, 2:13 pm, hpuxrac <johnbhur..._at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On Nov 24, 5:03 pm, joel garry <joel-ga..._at_home.com> wrote:
>
> snip
>
> > Yep, I missed it. I guess you've shown parallel is silly with
> > network_link.
>
> Au contraire mon frere ... using impdp with a network link and
> parallel just absolutely rocks.
>
Interesting, I better start trying these things. How does it not bottleneck?
> For even better performance get a CLONE of production ( from dasd
> based replication ) and bring it up on the same system as a test/dev
> system ... use network link except locally on same host ( not really
> across any network ) ( various options here like bequeath/etc avoiding
> tcp ) ....
>
> > Bush joins Peruvian flute band: http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/poncho.jpg
>
> ???
Reference is to South Park.
jg
-- @home.com is bogus. http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hYeLMJqiFwKObQxk17xIA70-fI2AD94LFVU80Received on Mon Nov 24 2008 - 19:02:42 CST