Re: Oracle Linux/Virtualization Software

From: Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:23:43 +0100
Message-ID: <fipnvv$sca$1@news1.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>

DA Morgan wrote:
> hpuxrac wrote:
>

>> You know this blind advocacy of anything oracle is getting pretty old
>> here in cdos from certain posters. 

>
> Blind negativity isn't a winner either.
>
> I'm not advocating Oracle's VM. I'm just saying that your negativity
> is without foundation in a single data point as you have never installed
> it in a lab and tested it.
>
> Blind advocacy would be to promote the claim as accurate or to promote
> the product neither of which I have done. And neither of which I will do
> until and unless I have personally tested it for months in my lab.
>
> You've got your facts wrong on Oracle on Mac OSX
> You've got your facts wrong on this too.
> Because, in neither case, do you have any facts at all.

Daniel,

your responses, as well as the latest change in signature, make your credibility lower:
- you do not have the facts, as admitted - you do not know for a fact John has put VM to the test, or not

Then you wander off in discussions about attitude vs aptitude, which word play is probably just understood by native english speakers, without going into technical details.

All I have witnessed from your part so far, are replies that justify Oracle's claims. They remain unsubstantiated, nevertheless.

You sound like you are an extension of Oracle marketing lately, which I find no change for the better.

I liked the old Daniel better.

-- 
Regards,
Frank van Bortel

Top-posting is one way to shut me up...

Received on Fri Nov 30 2007 - 13:23:43 CST