Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Sounds good in theory, but will it work?

Re: Sounds good in theory, but will it work?

From: bdbafh <bdbafh_at_gmail.com>
Date: 9 Nov 2006 12:04:43 -0800
Message-ID: <1163102683.891877.188670@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>

On Nov 9, 7:21 am, "Richard Foote" <richard.fo..._at_bigpond.nospam.com> wrote:
> "bdbafh" <bdb..._at_gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1163053419.755323.88880_at_h54g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > TB wrote:
> >> We have Oracle 8.1.7 running on an IBM p615 single processor server.
>
> > Oracle DataGuard does not exist in 8i R3.
> > It was introduced in 9i and is quite mature in 10g.No but the good old Standby database did exist and could serve these
> purposes quite well.
>
> Cheers
>
> Richard

Hi Richard,

"The practice of managing a standby database within Oracle is a time-honored one, whether its managed (dataguard) or handled by roll-your-own scripts. "

I did mention a user-managed database methodology, perhaps not clearly enough.
I did administrate user-managed standby databases back on 8.1.7 (Standard Edition).
The same scripts worked for 9.2 and 10.1, much to my (pleasant) surprise.

Sorry for the confusion.

-bdbafh Received on Thu Nov 09 2006 - 14:04:43 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US